Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Lights (Gareth Emery Album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Lights (Gareth Emery Album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. I am fairly irritated by the edit summary 4Sage Wiki used to remove my proposed deletion ("del error") - that wasn't a mistake. Laun chba ller 19:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is the debut album of Gareth Emery and its reissue in the form of a remix album. Little information and responds poorly to compile, especially singles (several editions only iTunes) I understand your irritation, but who compensates spent my time. Many articles in the wiki about anything (or two lines) and they are not removed. Maybe if the article is created, then why remove? Obtained from the better-known artists have debut and low-rated albums on the Wiki, and the rest can not. Seven days is too small. I am a rare visitor and "Northern Lights" added the article, because acquainted with the album, and I watch them every day. Wiki - a worldwide database and my opinion is that the labels need to coerce to work independently on entering data, rather than to lay down on the shoulders of all enthusiasts. Some indicate authorship nowhere can. Hopefully will concern with understanding.4Sage Wiki (talk) 22:34, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 20:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 20:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:46, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This album clearly passes WP:MUSIC, album is referenced here and here. The artist was voted the No. 9 top DJ in the world by DJ MAG in 2009, so any album he releases is most likely notable just based off of that fact. This nomination is somewhat confusing to me, I wonder if the nom conducted any WP:BEFORE. -War wizard90 (talk) 06:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.